EU-Presidency: Anti-globalisation Activists are Terrorists


Spain wants network of intelligence liaisons in the Member States to exchange information on political activists

The European Union repeatedly stated over the past few months that activists would not fall under the new anti-terrorist legislation. The distinction between political activists and terrorists would not be blurred. New proposals from Spain, the current EU-Presidency, however show different.

According to Spain, the European Member States have noticed 'a gradual increase at various European Union summits and other events, in violence and criminal damage orchestrated by radical extremist groups, clearly terrorising society'. In the eyes of Spain, these actions from activists against globalisation are without doubt terrorist activities. They are the work of 'a loose network hiding behind various social fronts', by which Spain mean 'organisations taking advantage of their lawful status to aid and abet the achievements of terrorist groups' aims'.

According to the Spanish proposal, 'violent urban youthful radicalism is increasingly being used as a cat's-paw by terrorist groups in order to achieve their criminal aims'. Therefore Spain wants to introduce a standard form for exchanging information on these 'terrorist incidents'. The information must be exchanged between Member States and Europol. Spain wants to use the BDL-network to exchange the information. This network belongs to the 'bureaux des liaisons', the network of intelligence liaisons in the Member States.

The aim of the information exchange is to 'help prevent such situations arising at summits and other events arranged by various international organisations', as well as 'the prosecuting of violent urban youthful radicalism'. The European Working Group on Terrorism, in which experts from law enforcement and intelligence agencies responsible for combating terrorism in each Member State participate, studies the proposal of Spain.

After the attacks of the 11th September in the United States, the European Union agreed new legislation on combating terrorism. The Union introduced a common definition on terrorism and a European arrest warrant. Civil liberties groups feared these proposals would criminalize political activism. But the European ministers of Justice stated over and over that the new measures were only directed at terrorists. Political activism, even when in turned into violence during demonstrations, would not fall under the scope of the new measures.

The new Spanish proposal however shows different. Political activism and 'social fronts' are directly linked to terrorism. Information has to be exchanged through the intelligence canals of the European Union to prosecute political activist. It is also noteworthy that Spain states that the organisations of political activists are 'aiding and abetting' the achievements of terrorist groups' aims. 'Aiding and abetting' is one of the things that have been made punishable under the new common definition on terrorism of the European Union.

Spain has a very specific approach to terrorism. During the 1st European Conference on Terrorism in Madrid in January 2001, the Spanish Minister of Internal Affairs, Jaime Mayor Oreha, stated: 'Terrorism is not only a group of commandos who act, but is a project that tries to root itself in society, and to combat it is also necessary to struggle against the social, economical, political and also communication structures which support and nourish it.' Spain is acting on this approach. A great many organisations, newspapers and radio stations have been forbidden by decrete in the last four years, without one of these cases ever even reaching a court.

On 17 January 2001, police in Amsterdam raided a famous 'legalised squat' and arrested Juan Ramón Rodrìguez Fernández, wanted by the Spanish police in connection with investigations into the separatist Basque group ETA. Fernández is the lead singer of KOP, a politically inspired band from Catalonia, and is accused by the Spanish police of having links to an "ETA-cell" that was rounded-up in Barcelona last year. He is wanted for allegedly passing information on Spanish neo-nazi groups such as Cedade to ETA, although this information is not known to have lead to any offences being committed.

[Download] Source (as PDF-file):

Fehler melden
Telepolis zitieren
Vielen Dank!

Darstellungsbreite ändern

Da bei großen Monitoren im Fullscreen-Modus die Zeilen teils unleserlich lang werden, können Sie hier die Breite auf das Minimum zurücksetzen. Die einmal gewählte Einstellung wird durch ein Cookie fortgesetzt, sofern Sie dieses akzeptieren.


Abhörstaat Deutschland

SIGINT-Landschaft Deutschland


MH370 und MH17 - Wer trägt den Schaden?

Christoph Jehle 05.11.2014

Wer muss für die Folgen der beiden Flugzeugabstürze aufkommen?

Innerhalb von weniger als fünf Monaten hat die inzwischen voll verstaatlichte Fluggesellschaft Malaysia Airline System (MAS) zwei voll besetzte Flugzeuge verloren. Die Gesellschaft sieht sich jetzt neben dem Rückgang der Buchungszahlen auch mit ersten Entschädigungsforderungen von Angehörigen der von den Abstürzen betroffenen Passagieren konfrontiert und muss den Verlust der beiden Flugzeuge verkraften. Wobei der letzte Punkt offensichtlich das geringste Problem darstellen dürfte.