Avatar von kostenfaktor
  • kostenfaktor

mehr als 1000 Beiträge seit 29.12.2013

"Freiheit" durch Faschismus wie in Portugal und "Sicherheit" durch Gladio-Terror

Von der Geschichte eines Bündnisses, das angetreten war, Europas Freiheit und Sicherheit zu garantieren

Das ist offenbar ironisch gemeint. Gründungsmitglied war mit Portugal die längste faschistische Diktatur und in der NATO wurden faschistische Terrornetzwerke aufgebaut, die Terroranschläge gegen die Zivilbevölkerung verübten. Das Schicksal von Nicht-US-Amerikanern war und ist Washington vollkommen egal. Das US-Imperium hat Europa nicht vom Faschismus befreit, sondern dies verhindert.

"Gladio: Geheimarmeen in Europa"

"Adenauer und die Sache mit der Verhinderung der Entnazifizierung"

"Seven Decades of Nazi Collaboration: America’s Dirty Little Ukraine Secret"

"The reasons for the warm American response to Fascism and Nazism that are detailed in these books are explained quite openly in the internal U.S. government planning record. For instance, a 1937 Report of the State Department's European Division described the rise of Fascism as the natural reaction of "the rich and middle classes, in self-defense" when the "dissatisfied masses, with the example of the Russian revolution before them, swing to the Left." Fascism therefore "must succeed or the masses, this time reinforced by the disillusioned middle classes, will again turn to the Left." The Report also noted that "if Fascism cannot succeed by persuasion [in Germany], it must succeed by force." It concluded that "economic appeasement should prove the surest route to world peace," a conclusion based on the belief that Fascism as a system was compatible with U.S. interests.
Furthermore, although Hitler's rhetorical commitments and actions were completely public, internal U.S. government documents from the 1930s refer to him as a "moderate." For example, the American chargé d'affaires in Berlin wrote to Washington in 1933 that the hope for Germany lay in "the more moderate section of the [Nazi] party, headed by Hitler himself . . . which appeal[s] to all civilized and reasonable people," and seems to have "the upper hand" over the violent fringe. "From the standpoint of stable political conditions, it is perhaps well that Hitler is now in a position to wield unprecedented power," noted the American Ambassador, Frederic Sackett. See Schmitz, The United States and Fascist Italy, 1922-1940,
pp. 140, 174, 133, and ch. 9; Foreign Relations of the United States, 1933, Vol. II ("British Commonwealth, Europe, Near East and Africa"), Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949, pp. 329, 209.

The U.S. reaction to Fascist Italy before the war was similar. A high-level inquiry of the Wilson administration determined in December 1917 that with rising labor militancy, Italy posed "the obvious danger of social revolution and disorganization." A State Department official noted privately that "If we are not careful we will have a second Russia on our hands," adding: "The Italians are like children" and "must be [led] and assisted more than almost any other nation." Mussolini's Blackshirts solved the problem by violence. They carried out "a fine young revolution," the American Ambassador to Italy observed approvingly, referring to Mussolini's March on Rome in October 1922, which brought Italian democracy to an end."

Das Posting wurde vom Benutzer editiert (11.05.2019 13:02).

- +